ChatGPT’s New Browsing Feature: A Closer Look at Search Engines vs ChatGPT

Search Engines vs ChatGPT

OpenAI has introduced a browsing feature for ChatGPT, limiting its ability to read web content to 100-word summaries to respect copyright laws. However, this new functionality comes with limitations and challenges.


OpenAI’s recent move to limit ChatGPT’s web browsing capability to concise 100-word summaries is aimed at safeguarding copyright.

While this step aligns with respecting intellectual property, it introduces a new set of challenges.

Unlike traditional search engines, which provide direct snippets from the source, ChatGPT rephrases information. While it often does a commendable job, there are instances where it may miss the essence or even provide incorrect information.

This raises a critical question

why opt for an AI summary when a direct citation from the original source is available via search engines?

The additional step of going through an AI summary may not be worth the effort, especially when accuracy is paramount.

It’s worth noting that even though search engines have their flaws, they remain a reliable option. Chatbots like ChatGPT still have a ways to go in terms of competing with the efficiency and accuracy of search engines.


In conclusion, while ChatGPT’s browsing feature is a step towards respecting copyright, it falls short in reliability compared to traditional search engines. As the technology evolves, future iterations may bridge this gap, but for now, search engines remain the go-to choice for accurate and direct information retrieval.

Share On:

Leave a Comment